Laura’s FPIES Recovery on the No-Plant GAPS Diet

Read Laura’s FPIES case from Gut and Physiology Syndrome: symptoms, No-Plant GAPS route, corn-fed chicken episode, four-month changes and three-year outcome.

Ebonie Garnica Avatar

Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate links. If you buy through one, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Any paid relationship is identified where it applies. Full disclosure.

Laura’s FPIES case in Gut and Physiology Syndrome follows a baby who was still struggling with feeding, growth, and development at 18 months. Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride describes using the No-Plant GAPS Diet with some fermented cabbage juice, then records the changes after four months and Laura’s progress after three years. The dates matter: the first improvements and the later move through the GAPS Introduction Diet happened over different lengths of time.[1]

I’m sharing Laura’s story from the book, not describing a child in my family. Following the history, the food changes, and the later milestones makes it easier to understand what Dr. Natasha reports. I’ll also connect the case with her wider No-Plant guidance so you can read the two together.

This reported case is not a home food-challenge plan. Repeated vomiting with unusual lethargy or dehydration needs urgent medical assessment. Work with your child’s allergy or feeding team before changing prescribed formula or testing a suspected trigger. Routine skin-prick and specific-IgE blood tests often do not detect FPIES.[3]

Tablet displaying the heading and opening sentence of Laura’s FPIES case beside Gut and Physiology Syndrome.
An illustrative reader display of Laura’s case from Gut and Physiology Syndrome.

Laura’s History Before No-Plant GAPS

Point in the CaseWhat the Book Reports
From birthLaura was exclusively breastfed.
12 weeksShe developed diarrhea with blood in her stool.
After the feeding changeHer doctor advised stopping breastfeeding and prescribed elemental formula, in which the protein is broken down into individual amino acids. The diarrhea continued.
When solids were triedShe developed projectile vomiting, lethargy and acid stools.
Testing and diagnosisTesting found reactions to most food proteins, and Laura was diagnosed with FPIES.
18 monthsShe remained on elemental formula with diarrhea, vomiting and anemia and was not growing or developing.

The book introduces FPIES as Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome, which it describes as a newer variation of food allergy or intolerance. In its typical infant picture, diarrhea, vomiting and dehydration appear during the first year. The same passage says testing may find reactions to many food proteins, including dairy, soy, egg, meat, grains, vegetables and sometimes breast milk.[1]

The feeding changes in the table help explain Laura’s starting point. Moving from breast milk to elemental formula had not stopped the diarrhea, and attempts at solid food brought further symptoms. These difficulties were still present at 18 months, when the book records the move to No-Plant GAPS.

No-Plant GAPS in Laura’s Case

Laura’s case names the No-Plant GAPS Diet and fermented cabbage juice. It does not give her full menu or a starting quantity for the juice. For the explanation of how foods are introduced, the relevant source is the surrounding No-Plant chapter.[1]

The chapter explains why Campbell-McBride developed this route. Some people continued to have diarrhea, abdominal pain and vomiting even on the first stage of the regular GAPS Introduction Diet, so she removed all plant matter. She says babies with FPIES were the first group to follow No-Plant GAPS.[2]

Dr. Natasha calls No-Plant GAPS the extreme end of the GAPS Nutritional Protocol and says to attempt it only when other approaches have not worked. She also recommends working with a Certified GAPS Practitioner. She describes the diet as temporary, with plant foods introduced and food choices widened as the person heals. This context matters when reading Laura’s story: the chapter is addressing very sensitive patients, rather than presenting an everyday first-food plan for every baby.[2]

What the Book Reports After Four Months

After four months on the diet, the book says Laura was thriving. She began gaining weight and developing, and her diarrhea and vomiting stopped. Those are the changes Campbell-McBride records at that point in the case.[1]

Laura then developed eczema. Dr. Natasha’s team suspected the corn-fed chicken used for her soups. Her mother found corn-free chicken, and the book reports that the eczema cleared. The sourcing change is part of Laura’s individual history; the case does not establish a cause for every child’s eczema.[1]

Where Laura Was After Three Years

After three years on her diet, Laura had reached Stage 3 of the GAPS Introduction Diet. Her food choices were still limited. Even so, Campbell-McBride describes her as doing very well, healthy overall, developing normally both mentally and physically and thriving.[1]

The four-month improvement and the three-year follow-up describe different kinds of progress. Laura’s symptoms, weight gain, and development improved first. Broadening her food choices took much longer, and the book still describes a limited menu at the three-year point.

The Case Timeline at a Glance

Age or DurationReported Point
12 weeks oldBloody diarrhea began.
18 months oldElemental formula, ongoing diarrhea and vomiting, anemia and no growth or development; No-Plant GAPS with fermented cabbage juice began.
4 months on the dietWeight gain and development began; diarrhea and vomiting stopped.
Later in the caseEczema appeared; corn-fed chicken was suspected; corn-free chicken was sourced for soups; eczema cleared.
3 years on the dietLaura had reached Intro Stage 3 and was described as healthy, thriving and developing normally.

How to Read Laura’s Timeline

Read the case with four questions in mind: How old was Laura? What was she eating before the change? What changed next? When did the reported improvement happen? The timeline above keeps those details together, so “doing better after four months” does not get confused with “eating a wide range of foods after four months.”

The missing details matter too. Laura’s paragraph does not supply a daily menu, a cabbage-juice amount, or every food-introduction step. Use the full No-Plant chapter and your child’s individual feeding guidance for those questions, rather than filling in the gaps from another child’s results.

Why I’m Sharing This Case

FPIES is not part of our family’s experience, and we have not followed No-Plant GAPS. What I find useful in this case is the patient, detailed record: the symptoms before the change, the improvement in growth and development, and the much slower expansion of foods. Those are distinct parts of the story, and keeping them together gives you a clearer picture of what Dr. Natasha reports.

Organize the No-Plant Route

You’ll find No-Plant GAPS Kitchen in the course catalog in my shop. For the book context behind this case, start with the No-Plant food and progression guide linked below.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Old Was Laura When No-Plant GAPS Began?

She was 18 months old. At that point, the book says she remained on elemental formula, had diarrhea, vomiting and anemia and was not growing or developing.[1]

What Did the Case Say Laura Started With?

The case says No-Plant GAPS with some fermented cabbage juice. It does not give a full menu or a cabbage-juice quantity in Laura’s paragraph.[1]

What Changed After Four Months?

Campbell-McBride reports that Laura began gaining weight and developing and that the diarrhea and vomiting stopped.[1]

What Happened With the Chicken?

After eczema appeared, the team suspected corn-fed chicken. Laura’s mother found corn-free chicken for the soups, and the book says the eczema cleared. The case does not provide a mechanism or turn that episode into a universal rule.[1]

Where Was Laura After Three Years?

She had reached Intro Stage 3 and still had limited food choices. The book describes her as healthy overall, thriving and developing normally mentally and physically.[1]

Your Next Step

For the wider source context, read the FPIES and GAPS overview and the No-Plant food and progression guide. They keep the book’s general guidance separate from Laura’s individual timeline.

If Laura’s story raises questions about your child’s feeding, take those questions and your child’s current feeding record to their allergy or feeding team. The No-Plant GAPS chapter in Gut and Physiology Syndrome gives the fuller source context. For the book’s discussion of nursing alongside first foods, see breastfeeding and solid foods in the GAPS failure-to-thrive sequence.

References

  1. Campbell-McBride, Natasha. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), “Case study of a baby with FPIES.”
  2. Campbell-McBride, Natasha. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), “No-Plant GAPS Diet,” first-patient groups and use boundary.
  3. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. International Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of FPIES (2017).

The personal beliefs, opinions, philosophies, and/or views shared in this article are solely based upon my own GAPS experience and may not align with nor reflect the views of GAPS or Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride, or the content in Dr. Natasha’s GAPS books, podcasts, blog posts, social media posts, or training courses.

Keep Reading

One response to “Laura’s FPIES Recovery on the No-Plant GAPS Diet”

  1. […] The book’s account of Laura follows an infant with persistent digestive symptoms through a later No-Plant GAPS intervention and reported improvements. Her ages, feeding changes and later progress are kept together in Laura’s FPIES case study.[3] […]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *