Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride directs readers with FPIES to the No-Plant GAPS Diet in her 2020 book, Gut and Physiology Syndrome. She describes a slow, individual approach for very sensitive digestion and reports children recovering with it.[1]
If you are reading because your child reacts to food, there are several questions to untangle: what the diagnosis means, why the book recommends this route, and how the reported cases relate to your child’s own history. I have followed GAPS with my family since July 2024. FPIES is not part of our family’s experience, so the patient stories here belong to the source families.
What FPIES Means
FPIES stands for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome. It is a gastrointestinal food allergy involving a non-IgE immune response. Symptoms can include delayed vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration. Routine allergy blood tests or skin-prick tests do not diagnose it; the food and reaction history matters.[2]
The book’s A–Z entry discusses babies and small children and also recognizes diagnoses in adults. Its detailed infant account describes unusually broad food reactions and serious feeding difficulties. That describes the patients being discussed, rather than a requirement that every person with FPIES reacts to all proteins.[1][3]
Why the Book Points to No-Plant GAPS
Campbell-McBride developed No-Plant GAPS after seeing patients continue to have diarrhea, abdominal pain and vomiting even with the small amounts of cooked vegetables in Intro Stage 1. She says babies with FPIES were the first group to follow it. The approach begins with fresh meat stock and gelatinous meats, with other foods introduced in a particular order.[3]
The same chapter calls this the extreme end of the protocol, describes it as difficult, and reserves it for situations where other approaches have not worked. It recommends working with a Certified GAPS Practitioner and transferring gradually from the previous feeding pattern. The condition’s named route and those use limits belong together.[3]
The official FAQ also reports FPIES patients recovering on the Introduction Diet. It does not provide the detailed No-Plant sequence. For the approach described specifically in the 2020 FPIES entry, read the FPIES food and introduction guide. It separates the routes without turning one patient’s starting point into a menu for every child.[1][4]
Read the Cases as Individual Histories
The book’s account of Laura follows an infant with persistent digestive symptoms through a later No-Plant GAPS intervention and reported improvements. Her ages, feeding changes and later progress are kept together in Laura’s FPIES case study.[3]
A separate parent letter from Mary K. describes a son who had severe multi-food reactions and a long history of hypoallergenic formula. She reports three months of gradually adding what she calls lamb broth before he could begin Intro with several tolerated foods. The letter includes anaphylaxis and other allergies; it does not make them the definition of FPIES. It also does not establish how every family should alter prescribed formula.[5]
These histories are worth reading carefully. Improvement in symptoms, weight gain, a wider food range and a formal food-tolerance assessment are different things to look for. A case may describe some of them at one time and others much later.
What the 2024 GAPS Case Series Adds
Planckaert and colleagues reported eight families: seven children classified as having FPIES and one with FPIAP. Four had a medical diagnosis; the other classifications used the reported histories. Parents supplied questionnaires or interviews. The detailed results describe five FPIES children reaching tolerance to all triggers, one not yet tested against trigger foods, and one still reacting to soy. The authors report encouraging outcomes and call for a larger comparison study. These are individual outcomes from a retrospective series, rather than a recovery rate that predicts another child’s result.[6]
Keep Feeding and Growth in View
In the No-Plant chapter, Campbell-McBride says a breastfed baby should continue breastfeeding during the transfer, while the mother follows Full GAPS. Elsewhere she discusses a distinct group of severely ill babies whose mothers’ milk she believed was contributing to illness and recommends a healthy wet nurse in those cases. Those are different passages, not a blanket instruction to stop nursing.[3][7]
Keep your child’s actual feeding arrangement, growth record and reaction plan alongside the book. Feeding changes for an infant need to preserve adequate nutrition. The food guide explains the source sequence and the reaction-record guide helps you bring the relevant history to the people caring for your child.
Choose the Guide That Answers Your Question
| Your Question | Where to Continue |
|---|---|
| Why does GAPS focus on the gut? | The gut and immune-system explanation |
| What does No-Plant include? | Foods, progression and nursing context |
| What should I record after a reaction? | Symptoms, timing and feeding history |
| What exactly happened to Laura? | The separate published case study |
For organizing appointments and observations, my Care Team Log is intended to keep the information together. A dated notebook can do that job now. Start with the record you already have, including the foods your child tolerates, rather than trying to reconstruct everything at once.
References
- Campbell-McBride, N. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), A–Z, FPIES.
- ACAAI. FPIES overview and diagnosis.
- Campbell-McBride, N. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), No-Plant GAPS Diet, implementation, coming off and Laura’s case.
- Campbell-McBride, N. Official GAPS FAQs, Diet/Food, question 63.
- Campbell-McBride, N. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), Immune System, parent letter signed Mary K..
- Planckaert et al. (2024). The GAPS Nutritional Protocol and FPIES/FPIAP, Methods and detailed Results.
- Campbell-McBride, N. Gut and Physiology Syndrome (2020), Breastfeeding and A–Z, Wet nursing.
Leave a comment